“We value people” Series: Part I-Overview

One thing I have found to be pretty much constant in every organization I have encountered, whether as an employee, consultant or other is that they all describe their culture as one that values their people.  Every one.  Another thing I have found is that it is relatively uncommon for employees in organizations to say they feel valued.   The disconnect is puzzling.  I have worked with leaders who sincerely want their employees to feel engaged and appreciated and just don’t know why nothing works.   My theory about what causes the disconnect can be summed up in two words: Clarity and Expectations.   Part of this lies in our culture and part of it in simple human nature but I do think that if organizations are clear and intentional about what they can provide employees and what employees can expect in return, then more employees will feel fairly treated and invested in their organizations.

It seems like there always has been tension between employer and employee: 
Our European feudal roots were one of aristocracy and peasants.   If one was not born into the aristocracy, one was likely to live on a farm owned by a rich landlord.  One’s life was spent eking out a living and any excess went to the landlord.   As scientific ‘advances’ were made, it became easier to accumulate excess everywhere.  This allowed for factories, mass production and industrial revolution.  Now, it was possible for an individual to hire many employees and for people to make a living working for someone else.  

Over the last few hundred years we have seen such extremes as owners brutalizing, endangering and even cheating employees and employee groups refusing to work unless owners provided benefits and wages they could not sustain.  Around the middle of the twentieth century a sort of détente was realized.  Organizations acknowledged they could not be successful without the willing participation of employees (aided perhaps by the rise of communism and a genuine fear of what could happen if laborers were pushed too far) and employees began to realize the power they had, as well as the choices that were available.   

In an effort to retain the best of the best, and aided by a booming post war economy, organizations began to offer things like job security, pensions and entitlements.  This seems to have ‘stuck’ in the collective consciousness of our society, despite the facts that the world is very different.  With several economic crashes in the last twenty years and more looming, more people than ever have experienced the dooming sensation of being let go from a job they thought would sustain their family until retirement.  We’ve seen corporations intentionally steal people’s pensions and we’ve seen lives and health endangered to increase bottom lines.  People don’t trust big corporations anymore and we have seen an upsurge in entrepreneurs like never before in response. 

Today, we say we know that job security doesn’t exist and that our employer is not expected to provide for our every need.  But do people really believe it?  What do we really expect from our employers and what does it mean to feel ‘valued’?  We’ve all seen the surveys that support the idea that what workers really want is to be appreciated and empowered and that pay is not really the issues.  We’ve also all been exposed to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and understand that if one is not earning enough to acquire basic food and shelter, that one will not be happy.   

When organizations say they value people, they usually mean that they acknowledge that without people, the basic functions of the organization could not be accomplished and that therefore the organization wants competent people to agree to work there and contribute.  Some company owners generally want people to be happy as well, but if they honestly had to choose between a productive worker and a happy one, they would choose productive.  So they walk a line and try to figure out ways to make workers be productive AND happy.

When employees say they want to be valued, they don’t usually mean they want to come work for an organization and contribute their very best to the bottom line.  They usually mean they want to be liked, appreciated, well compensated, afforded flexibility and essentially treated as friends or family members and not just numbers.  

There is a gigantic potential for unmet expectations here.  There is the unrealistic expectation on the part of the organization that people’s humanity can be ignored, and the unrealistic expectation on the part of the employee that the organization is the one responsible for their emotion and financial wellbeing for life.  An organization that is clear from the outset of what it can and will provide employees by way of emotional support, financial compensation, opportunities for creative and independent thought will go a long way to attract and retain the types of employees whose needs mirror what the organization can offer.  Promising what everyone wants to hear and not delivering is THE biggest contributor to dissatisfaction. 

There are some clearly established milestones in the employee lifecycle:  Recruitment, Onboarding, Employment, Termination and each one is a significant opportunity to ensure the right people are in the right organization and are engaged, effective and ambassadors for the organization.  Companies, either intentionally or unintentionally, invest a great deal of resources in each stage; sometimes more with a bad hiring decision than with a good.  

In the next installment, we’ll review what can be done from a recruiting standpoint to ensure realistic expectations and effective matches. 

By Carrie Maldonado

Carrie Maldonado, is an organizational development consultant, author, and speaker. Carrie's eclectic mix of professional interests include writing, speaking, coaching, and consulting on topics ranging from organizational behavior management to spiritual transformation in and out of the workplace. Carrie lives in the beautiful Pacific Northwest with her patient and long-suffering husband and their three children.

Leave a Reply